Is competitive running worth the price of admission?
Jul 23rd, 2011 | By Dave | Category: Top News
I read in this month’s issue of Runner’s World magazine (Aug 2011, pp 82-83) that racing has never been more expensive for runners and more profitable for organizers. Still, running is also more popular than ever.
I guess the great profit motive will try to get its parasitic tentacles on everything it can, including the good intentions of runners, who generally believe that races are organized around meeting the monetary needs of various charitable causes.
Obviously this is annoying to me.
However, in the same article the editors pointed out one thing that I also think is missing from running events: The fun factor. Rock ‘n Roll series of for-profit races (also on Facebook) is a popular national event that really brings the fun factor to bear – but it is not cheap!
“These races might cost more than the average marathon (the regular fee for the San Antonio race is $120), but they deliver live bands, cheerleaders, themed water stations and a postrace concert.” – Runner’s World magazine
Wow. That is crazy money! It sounds great, but I’d have to pass unless I could get someone to sponsor me (which will be the topic of a future blog post).
Racing in competitive events is a great way to motivate your training, establish personal records and meetup with like-minded enthusiasts. But there needs to be a middle point. Somewhere between boring charity races that are affordable and super-rockin’ race events that are way overpriced – that is where I want to be.
What do you think? How much is too much for an entrance fee? How much have you paid? Do you seek sponsorships or do you budget the fees?
Comments from Facebook:




